← Back to the personnel file
EXHIBIT NO. 01 QA PERSONNEL FILE / KR–01 STATUS: OPEN

Test
documentation

Not paperwork for its own sake, but a clear map: what we test, why, and what we found.

FormatsChecklists / test reports
Case scopemacOS / Desktop
PrincipleSeparate facts from assumptions
01 / APPROACH

Structure comes first

I break a product down into features and user flows, set priorities, and only then turn the checks into documentation.

02 / RESULTS

Record the facts

I record clear outcomes so nobody has to reconstruct the product's state from memory.

ACTUAL REPORT · MOTI · 5 OCT 2026

Smoke and in-depth testing of a local build

PASS WITH ISSUES
IDTR-2026-10-05
BuildLocal macOS build
MethodsAutomated tests · hands-on checks · AI response analysis
SCOPE

Pet state, care, memory, planner, notification queue, persistence, app signing, and the semantic accuracy of local AI responses.

AreaResultComment
Core logic13 / 13 PASS

State, needs, persistence, personality, and autonomous behaviour.

Notifications13 / 13 PASS

Queue, deduplication, snoozing, and recovery.

Planner19 / 19 PASS

Dates, leap years, quotation marks, and all-day events.

App packagePASS

Signing, Info.plist, and static checks.

Live interfacePARTIAL

Chat, menus, and a demo bubble were checked; the complete reminder flow was not.

AI response meaning2 / 8 OK

Five problematic responses and one processing error in a separate sample.

CONCLUSION

Passing automated checks support the logic, but do not prove the live product is ready.

LIMITATIONS

Full calendar and task CRUD, system notification delivery, and extended load testing were not counted as verified in this report.

Next exhibit Bug reports →